changeset 34116:805808a558cf v9.1.0022

patch 9.1.0022: Coverity complains about improper use of negative value Commit: https://github.com/vim/vim/commit/49471963fefbdf78239d9066d84e14e1876fb177 Author: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org> Date: Fri Jan 12 17:48:08 2024 +0100 patch 9.1.0022: Coverity complains about improper use of negative value Problem: Coverity complains about improper use of negative value Solution: Add a condition to validate that keytyped is larger or equal to 0 Apparently patch 9.1.0006 made it more explicit for Coverity, that the TOLOWER_LOC() macros do not handle negative values properly. However, that condition has always been there even before that, so add a condition to verify that keytyped is indeed at least 0 closes: #13824 Signed-off-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>
author Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>
date Fri, 12 Jan 2024 18:00:04 +0100
parents 8b2a428e4ec9
children 90c8857fdf3e
files src/cindent.c src/version.c
diffstat 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) [+]
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/src/cindent.c
+++ b/src/cindent.c
@@ -4108,7 +4108,8 @@ in_cinkeys(
 		}
 		else
 		    // TODO: multi-byte
-		    if (keytyped == (int)p[-1] || (icase && keytyped < 256
+		    if (keytyped == (int)p[-1] || (icase
+				&& keytyped < 256 && keytyped >= 0
 			 && TOLOWER_LOC(keytyped) == TOLOWER_LOC((int)p[-1])))
 		{
 		    line = ml_get_cursor();
--- a/src/version.c
+++ b/src/version.c
@@ -705,6 +705,8 @@ static char *(features[]) =
 static int included_patches[] =
 {   /* Add new patch number below this line */
 /**/
+    22,
+/**/
     21,
 /**/
     20,