Mercurial > vim
view src/vim_mask.xbm @ 34116:805808a558cf v9.1.0022
patch 9.1.0022: Coverity complains about improper use of negative value
Commit: https://github.com/vim/vim/commit/49471963fefbdf78239d9066d84e14e1876fb177
Author: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>
Date: Fri Jan 12 17:48:08 2024 +0100
patch 9.1.0022: Coverity complains about improper use of negative value
Problem: Coverity complains about improper use of negative value
Solution: Add a condition to validate that keytyped is larger or equal
to 0
Apparently patch 9.1.0006 made it more explicit for Coverity, that the
TOLOWER_LOC() macros do not handle negative values properly. However,
that condition has always been there even before that, so add a
condition to verify that keytyped is indeed at least 0
closes: #13824
Signed-off-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>
| author | Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org> |
|---|---|
| date | Fri, 12 Jan 2024 18:00:04 +0100 |
| parents | 3fc0f57ecb91 |
| children |
line wrap: on
line source
#define vim_mask_icon_width 32 #define vim_mask_icon_height 32 static unsigned char vim_mask_icon_bits[] = { 0x00, 0x80, 0x01, 0x00, 0x00, 0xc0, 0x03, 0x00, 0xfc, 0xff, 0xff, 0x3f, 0xfc, 0xff, 0xff, 0x3f, 0xfc, 0xff, 0xff, 0x7f, 0xf8, 0xff, 0xff, 0x7f, 0xf0, 0xff, 0xff, 0x7f, 0xf0, 0xff, 0xff, 0x3f, 0xf0, 0xff, 0xff, 0x1f, 0xf0, 0xff, 0xff, 0x0f, 0xf0, 0xff, 0xff, 0x07, 0xf0, 0xff, 0xff, 0x0f, 0xf8, 0xff, 0xff, 0x1f, 0xfc, 0xff, 0xff, 0x3f, 0xfe, 0xff, 0xff, 0x7f, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xfe, 0xff, 0xff, 0x7f, 0xfc, 0xff, 0xff, 0x3f, 0xf8, 0xff, 0xff, 0x1f, 0xf0, 0xff, 0xff, 0x0f, 0xf0, 0xff, 0xff, 0x5f, 0xf0, 0xff, 0xff, 0x3f, 0xf0, 0xff, 0xff, 0x7f, 0xf0, 0xff, 0xff, 0x3f, 0xf0, 0xff, 0xff, 0x3f, 0xf0, 0xff, 0xff, 0x3f, 0xf0, 0xff, 0xff, 0x3f, 0xf0, 0xff, 0xff, 0x7f, 0xd0, 0xe1, 0xdf, 0x1c, 0x00, 0xc0, 0x43, 0x00, 0x00, 0x80, 0x01, 0x00};