874
|
1 *usr_44.txt* For Vim version 7.0. Last change: 2006 Apr 24
|
7
|
2
|
|
3 VIM USER MANUAL - by Bram Moolenaar
|
|
4
|
|
5 Your own syntax highlighted
|
|
6
|
|
7
|
|
8 Vim comes with highlighting for a couple of hundred different file types. If
|
|
9 the file you are editing isn't included, read this chapter to find out how to
|
|
10 get this type of file highlighted. Also see |:syn-define| in the reference
|
|
11 manual.
|
|
12
|
|
13 |44.1| Basic syntax commands
|
|
14 |44.2| Keywords
|
|
15 |44.3| Matches
|
|
16 |44.4| Regions
|
|
17 |44.5| Nested items
|
|
18 |44.6| Following groups
|
|
19 |44.7| Other arguments
|
|
20 |44.8| Clusters
|
|
21 |44.9| Including another syntax file
|
|
22 |44.10| Synchronizing
|
|
23 |44.11| Installing a syntax file
|
|
24 |44.12| Portable syntax file layout
|
|
25
|
|
26 Next chapter: |usr_45.txt| Select your language
|
|
27 Previous chapter: |usr_43.txt| Using filetypes
|
|
28 Table of contents: |usr_toc.txt|
|
|
29
|
|
30 ==============================================================================
|
|
31 *44.1* Basic syntax commands
|
|
32
|
|
33 Using an existing syntax file to start with will save you a lot of time. Try
|
|
34 finding a syntax file in $VIMRUNTIME/syntax for a language that is similar.
|
|
35 These files will also show you the normal layout of a syntax file. To
|
|
36 understand it, you need to read the following.
|
|
37
|
|
38 Let's start with the basic arguments. Before we start defining any new
|
|
39 syntax, we need to clear out any old definitions: >
|
|
40
|
|
41 :syntax clear
|
|
42
|
|
43 This isn't required in the final syntax file, but very useful when
|
|
44 experimenting.
|
|
45
|
|
46 There are more simplifications in this chapter. If you are writing a syntax
|
|
47 file to be used by others, read all the way through the end to find out the
|
|
48 details.
|
|
49
|
|
50
|
|
51 LISTING DEFINED ITEMS
|
|
52
|
|
53 To check which syntax items are currently defined, use this command: >
|
|
54
|
|
55 :syntax
|
|
56
|
|
57 You can use this to check which items have actually been defined. Quite
|
|
58 useful when you are experimenting with a new syntax file. It also shows the
|
|
59 colors used for each item, which helps to find out what is what.
|
|
60 To list the items in a specific syntax group use: >
|
|
61
|
|
62 :syntax list {group-name}
|
|
63
|
|
64 This also can be used to list clusters (explained in |44.8|). Just include
|
|
65 the @ in the name.
|
|
66
|
|
67
|
|
68 MATCHING CASE
|
|
69
|
|
70 Some languages are not case sensitive, such as Pascal. Others, such as C, are
|
|
71 case sensitive. You need to tell which type you have with the following
|
|
72 commands: >
|
|
73 :syntax case match
|
|
74 :syntax case ignore
|
|
75
|
|
76 The "match" argument means that Vim will match the case of syntax elements.
|
|
77 Therefore, "int" differs from "Int" and "INT". If the "ignore" argument is
|
|
78 used, the following are equivalent: "Procedure", "PROCEDURE" and "procedure".
|
|
79 The ":syntax case" commands can appear anywhere in a syntax file and affect
|
|
80 the syntax definitions that follow. In most cases, you have only one ":syntax
|
|
81 case" command in your syntax file; if you work with an unusual language that
|
|
82 contains both case-sensitive and non-case-sensitive elements, however, you can
|
|
83 scatter the ":syntax case" command throughout the file.
|
|
84
|
|
85 ==============================================================================
|
|
86 *44.2* Keywords
|
|
87
|
|
88 The most basic syntax elements are keywords. To define a keyword, use the
|
|
89 following form: >
|
|
90
|
|
91 :syntax keyword {group} {keyword} ...
|
|
92
|
|
93 The {group} is the name of a syntax group. With the ":highlight" command you
|
|
94 can assign colors to a {group}. The {keyword} argument is an actual keyword.
|
|
95 Here are a few examples: >
|
|
96
|
|
97 :syntax keyword xType int long char
|
|
98 :syntax keyword xStatement if then else endif
|
|
99
|
|
100 This example uses the group names "xType" and "xStatement". By convention,
|
|
101 each group name is prefixed by the filetype for the language being defined.
|
|
102 This example defines syntax for the x language (eXample language without an
|
|
103 interesting name). In a syntax file for "csh" scripts the name "cshType"
|
|
104 would be used. Thus the prefix is equal to the value of 'filetype'.
|
|
105 These commands cause the words "int", "long" and "char" to be highlighted
|
|
106 one way and the words "if", "then", "else" and "endif" to be highlighted
|
|
107 another way. Now you need to connect the x group names to standard Vim
|
|
108 names. You do this with the following commands: >
|
|
109
|
|
110 :highlight link xType Type
|
|
111 :highlight link xStatement Statement
|
|
112
|
|
113 This tells Vim to highlight "xType" like "Type" and "xStatement" like
|
|
114 "Statement". See |group-name| for the standard names.
|
|
115
|
|
116
|
|
117 UNUSUAL KEYWORDS
|
|
118
|
|
119 The characters used in a keyword must be in the 'iskeyword' option. If you
|
|
120 use another character, the word will never match. Vim doesn't give a warning
|
|
121 message for this.
|
|
122 The x language uses the '-' character in keywords. This is how it's done:
|
|
123 >
|
|
124 :setlocal iskeyword+=-
|
|
125 :syntax keyword xStatement when-not
|
|
126
|
|
127 The ":setlocal" command is used to change 'iskeyword' only for the current
|
|
128 buffer. Still it does change the behavior of commands like "w" and "*". If
|
|
129 that is not wanted, don't define a keyword but use a match (explained in the
|
|
130 next section).
|
|
131
|
|
132 The x language allows for abbreviations. For example, "next" can be
|
|
133 abbreviated to "n", "ne" or "nex". You can define them by using this command:
|
|
134 >
|
|
135 :syntax keyword xStatement n[ext]
|
|
136
|
|
137 This doesn't match "nextone", keywords always match whole words only.
|
|
138
|
|
139 ==============================================================================
|
|
140 *44.3* Matches
|
|
141
|
|
142 Consider defining something a bit more complex. You want to match ordinary
|
|
143 identifiers. To do this, you define a match syntax item. This one matches
|
|
144 any word consisting of only lowercase letters: >
|
|
145
|
|
146 :syntax match xIdentifier /\<\l\+\>/
|
|
147 <
|
|
148 Note:
|
|
149 Keywords overrule any other syntax item. Thus the keywords "if",
|
|
150 "then", etc., will be keywords, as defined with the ":syntax keyword"
|
|
151 commands above, even though they also match the pattern for
|
|
152 xIdentifier.
|
|
153
|
|
154 The part at the end is a pattern, like it's used for searching. The // is
|
|
155 used to surround the pattern (like how it's done in a ":substitute" command).
|
|
156 You can use any other character, like a plus or a quote.
|
|
157
|
|
158 Now define a match for a comment. In the x language it is anything from # to
|
|
159 the end of a line: >
|
|
160
|
|
161 :syntax match xComment /#.*/
|
|
162
|
|
163 Since you can use any search pattern, you can highlight very complex things
|
|
164 with a match item. See |pattern| for help on search patterns.
|
|
165
|
|
166 ==============================================================================
|
|
167 *44.4* Regions
|
|
168
|
|
169 In the example x language, strings are enclosed in double quotation marks (").
|
|
170 To highlight strings you define a region. You need a region start (double
|
|
171 quote) and a region end (double quote). The definition is as follows: >
|
|
172
|
|
173 :syntax region xString start=/"/ end=/"/
|
|
174
|
|
175 The "start" and "end" directives define the patterns used to find the start
|
|
176 and end of the region. But what about strings that look like this?
|
|
177
|
|
178 "A string with a double quote (\") in it" ~
|
|
179
|
|
180 This creates a problem: The double quotation marks in the middle of the string
|
|
181 will end the region. You need to tell Vim to skip over any escaped double
|
|
182 quotes in the string. Do this with the skip keyword: >
|
|
183
|
|
184 :syntax region xString start=/"/ skip=/\\"/ end=/"/
|
|
185
|
|
186 The double backslash matches a single backslash, since the backslash is a
|
|
187 special character in search patterns.
|
|
188
|
|
189 When to use a region instead of a match? The main difference is that a match
|
|
190 item is a single pattern, which must match as a whole. A region starts as
|
|
191 soon as the "start" pattern matches. Whether the "end" pattern is found or
|
|
192 not doesn't matter. Thus when the item depends on the "end" pattern to match,
|
|
193 you cannot use a region. Otherwise, regions are often simpler to define. And
|
|
194 it is easier to use nested items, as is explained in the next section.
|
|
195
|
|
196 ==============================================================================
|
|
197 *44.5* Nested items
|
|
198
|
|
199 Take a look at this comment:
|
|
200
|
|
201 %Get input TODO: Skip white space ~
|
|
202
|
|
203 You want to highlight TODO in big yellow letters, even though it is in a
|
|
204 comment that is highlighted blue. To let Vim know about this, you define the
|
|
205 following syntax groups: >
|
|
206
|
|
207 :syntax keyword xTodo TODO contained
|
|
208 :syntax match xComment /%.*/ contains=xTodo
|
|
209
|
|
210 In the first line, the "contained" argument tells Vim that this keyword can
|
|
211 exist only inside another syntax item. The next line has "contains=xTodo".
|
|
212 This indicates that the xTodo syntax element is inside it. The result is that
|
|
213 the comment line as a whole is matched with "xComment" and made blue. The
|
|
214 word TODO inside it is matched by xTodo and highlighted yellow (highlighting
|
|
215 for xTodo was setup for this).
|
|
216
|
|
217
|
|
218 RECURSIVE NESTING
|
|
219
|
|
220 The x language defines code blocks in curly braces. And a code block may
|
|
221 contain other code blocks. This can be defined this way: >
|
|
222
|
|
223 :syntax region xBlock start=/{/ end=/}/ contains=xBlock
|
|
224
|
|
225 Suppose you have this text:
|
|
226
|
|
227 while i < b { ~
|
|
228 if a { ~
|
|
229 b = c; ~
|
|
230 } ~
|
|
231 } ~
|
|
232
|
|
233 First a xBlock starts at the { in the first line. In the second line another
|
|
234 { is found. Since we are inside a xBlock item, and it contains itself, a
|
|
235 nested xBlock item will start here. Thus the "b = c" line is inside the
|
|
236 second level xBlock region. Then a } is found in the next line, which matches
|
|
237 with the end pattern of the region. This ends the nested xBlock. Because the
|
|
238 } is included in the nested region, it is hidden from the first xBlock region.
|
|
239 Then at the last } the first xBlock region ends.
|
|
240
|
|
241
|
|
242 KEEPING THE END
|
|
243
|
|
244 Consider the following two syntax items: >
|
|
245
|
|
246 :syntax region xComment start=/%/ end=/$/ contained
|
|
247 :syntax region xPreProc start=/#/ end=/$/ contains=xComment
|
|
248
|
|
249 You define a comment as anything from % to the end of the line. A
|
|
250 preprocessor directive is anything from # to the end of the line. Because you
|
|
251 can have a comment on a preprocessor line, the preprocessor definition
|
|
252 includes a "contains=xComment" argument. Now look what happens with this
|
|
253 text:
|
|
254
|
|
255 #define X = Y % Comment text ~
|
|
256 int foo = 1; ~
|
|
257
|
|
258 What you see is that the second line is also highlighted as xPreProc. The
|
|
259 preprocessor directive should end at the end of the line. That is why
|
|
260 you have used "end=/$/". So what is going wrong?
|
|
261 The problem is the contained comment. The comment starts with % and ends
|
|
262 at the end of the line. After the comment ends, the preprocessor syntax
|
|
263 continues. This is after the end of the line has been seen, so the next
|
|
264 line is included as well.
|
|
265 To avoid this problem and to avoid a contained syntax item eating a needed
|
|
266 end of line, use the "keepend" argument. This takes care of
|
|
267 the double end-of-line matching: >
|
|
268
|
|
269 :syntax region xComment start=/%/ end=/$/ contained
|
|
270 :syntax region xPreProc start=/#/ end=/$/ contains=xComment keepend
|
|
271
|
|
272
|
|
273 CONTAINING MANY ITEMS
|
|
274
|
|
275 You can use the contains argument to specify that everything can be contained.
|
|
276 For example: >
|
|
277
|
|
278 :syntax region xList start=/\[/ end=/\]/ contains=ALL
|
|
279
|
|
280 All syntax items will be contained in this one. It also contains itself, but
|
|
281 not at the same position (that would cause an endless loop).
|
|
282 You can specify that some groups are not contained. Thus contain all
|
|
283 groups but the ones that are listed:
|
|
284 >
|
|
285 :syntax region xList start=/\[/ end=/\]/ contains=ALLBUT,xString
|
|
286
|
|
287 With the "TOP" item you can include all items that don't have a "contained"
|
|
288 argument. "CONTAINED" is used to only include items with a "contained"
|
|
289 argument. See |:syn-contains| for the details.
|
|
290
|
|
291 ==============================================================================
|
|
292 *44.6* Following groups
|
|
293
|
|
294 The x language has statements in this form:
|
|
295
|
|
296 if (condition) then ~
|
|
297
|
|
298 You want to highlight the three items differently. But "(condition)" and
|
|
299 "then" might also appear in other places, where they get different
|
|
300 highlighting. This is how you can do this: >
|
|
301
|
|
302 :syntax match xIf /if/ nextgroup=xIfCondition skipwhite
|
|
303 :syntax match xIfCondition /([^)]*)/ contained nextgroup=xThen skipwhite
|
|
304 :syntax match xThen /then/ contained
|
|
305
|
|
306 The "nextgroup" argument specifies which item can come next. This is not
|
|
307 required. If none of the items that are specified are found, nothing happens.
|
|
308 For example, in this text:
|
|
309
|
|
310 if not (condition) then ~
|
|
311
|
|
312 The "if" is matched by xIf. "not" doesn't match the specified nextgroup
|
|
313 xIfCondition, thus only the "if" is highlighted.
|
|
314
|
|
315 The "skipwhite" argument tells Vim that white space (spaces and tabs) may
|
|
316 appear in between the items. Similar arguments are "skipnl", which allows a
|
|
317 line break in between the items, and "skipempty", which allows empty lines.
|
|
318 Notice that "skipnl" doesn't skip an empty line, something must match after
|
|
319 the line break.
|
|
320
|
|
321 ==============================================================================
|
|
322 *44.7* Other arguments
|
|
323
|
|
324 MATCHGROUP
|
|
325
|
|
326 When you define a region, the entire region is highlighted according to the
|
|
327 group name specified. To highlight the text enclosed in parentheses () with
|
|
328 the group xInside, for example, use the following command: >
|
|
329
|
|
330 :syntax region xInside start=/(/ end=/)/
|
|
331
|
|
332 Suppose, that you want to highlight the parentheses differently. You can do
|
|
333 this with a lot of convoluted region statements, or you can use the
|
|
334 "matchgroup" argument. This tells Vim to highlight the start and end of a
|
|
335 region with a different highlight group (in this case, the xParen group): >
|
|
336
|
|
337 :syntax region xInside matchgroup=xParen start=/(/ end=/)/
|
|
338
|
|
339 The "matchgroup" argument applies to the start or end match that comes after
|
|
340 it. In the previous example both start and end are highlighted with xParen.
|
|
341 To highlight the end with xParenEnd: >
|
|
342
|
|
343 :syntax region xInside matchgroup=xParen start=/(/
|
|
344 \ matchgroup=xParenEnd end=/)/
|
|
345
|
|
346 A side effect of using "matchgroup" is that contained items will not match in
|
|
347 the start or end of the region. The example for "transparent" uses this.
|
|
348
|
|
349
|
|
350 TRANSPARENT
|
|
351
|
|
352 In a C language file you would like to highlight the () text after a "while"
|
|
353 differently from the () text after a "for". In both of these there can be
|
|
354 nested () items, which should be highlighted in the same way. You must make
|
|
355 sure the () highlighting stops at the matching ). This is one way to do this:
|
|
356 >
|
|
357 :syntax region cWhile matchgroup=cWhile start=/while\s*(/ end=/)/
|
|
358 \ contains=cCondNest
|
|
359 :syntax region cFor matchgroup=cFor start=/for\s*(/ end=/)/
|
|
360 \ contains=cCondNest
|
|
361 :syntax region cCondNest start=/(/ end=/)/ contained transparent
|
|
362
|
|
363 Now you can give cWhile and cFor different highlighting. The cCondNest item
|
|
364 can appear in either of them, but take over the highlighting of the item it is
|
|
365 contained in. The "transparent" argument causes this.
|
|
366 Notice that the "matchgroup" argument has the same group as the item
|
|
367 itself. Why define it then? Well, the side effect of using a matchgroup is
|
|
368 that contained items are not found in the match with the start item then.
|
|
369 This avoids that the cCondNest group matches the ( just after the "while" or
|
|
370 "for". If this would happen, it would span the whole text until the matching
|
|
371 ) and the region would continue after it. Now cCondNest only matches after
|
|
372 the match with the start pattern, thus after the first (.
|
|
373
|
|
374
|
|
375 OFFSETS
|
|
376
|
|
377 Suppose you want to define a region for the text between ( and ) after an
|
|
378 "if". But you don't want to include the "if" or the ( and ). You can do this
|
|
379 by specifying offsets for the patterns. Example: >
|
|
380
|
|
381 :syntax region xCond start=/if\s*(/ms=e+1 end=/)/me=s-1
|
|
382
|
|
383 The offset for the start pattern is "ms=e+1". "ms" stands for Match Start.
|
|
384 This defines an offset for the start of the match. Normally the match starts
|
|
385 where the pattern matches. "e+1" means that the match now starts at the end
|
|
386 of the pattern match, and then one character further.
|
|
387 The offset for the end pattern is "me=s-1". "me" stands for Match End.
|
|
388 "s-1" means the start of the pattern match and then one character back. The
|
|
389 result is that in this text:
|
|
390
|
|
391 if (foo == bar) ~
|
|
392
|
|
393 Only the text "foo == bar" will be highlighted as xCond.
|
|
394
|
|
395 More about offsets here: |:syn-pattern-offset|.
|
|
396
|
|
397
|
|
398 ONELINE
|
|
399
|
|
400 The "oneline" argument indicates that the region does not cross a line
|
|
401 boundary. For example: >
|
|
402
|
|
403 :syntax region xIfThen start=/if/ end=/then/ oneline
|
|
404
|
|
405 This defines a region that starts at "if" and ends at "then". But if there is
|
|
406 no "then" after the "if", the region doesn't match.
|
|
407
|
|
408 Note:
|
|
409 When using "oneline" the region doesn't start if the end pattern
|
|
410 doesn't match in the same line. Without "oneline" Vim does _not_
|
|
411 check if there is a match for the end pattern. The region starts even
|
|
412 when the end pattern doesn't match in the rest of the file.
|
|
413
|
|
414
|
|
415 CONTINUATION LINES AND AVOIDING THEM
|
|
416
|
|
417 Things now become a little more complex. Let's define a preprocessor line.
|
|
418 This starts with a # in the first column and continues until the end of the
|
|
419 line. A line that ends with \ makes the next line a continuation line. The
|
|
420 way you handle this is to allow the syntax item to contain a continuation
|
|
421 pattern: >
|
|
422
|
|
423 :syntax region xPreProc start=/^#/ end=/$/ contains=xLineContinue
|
|
424 :syntax match xLineContinue "\\$" contained
|
|
425
|
|
426 In this case, although xPreProc normally matches a single line, the group
|
|
427 contained in it (namely xLineContinue) lets it go on for more than one line.
|
|
428 For example, it would match both of these lines:
|
|
429
|
|
430 #define SPAM spam spam spam \ ~
|
|
431 bacon and spam ~
|
|
432
|
|
433 In this case, this is what you want. If it is not what you want, you can call
|
|
434 for the region to be on a single line by adding "excludenl" to the contained
|
|
435 pattern. For example, you want to highlight "end" in xPreProc, but only at
|
|
436 the end of the line. To avoid making the xPreProc continue on the next line,
|
|
437 like xLineContinue does, use "excludenl" like this: >
|
|
438
|
|
439 :syntax region xPreProc start=/^#/ end=/$/
|
|
440 \ contains=xLineContinue,xPreProcEnd
|
|
441 :syntax match xPreProcEnd excludenl /end$/ contained
|
|
442 :syntax match xLineContinue "\\$" contained
|
|
443
|
|
444 "excludenl" must be placed before the pattern. Since "xLineContinue" doesn't
|
|
445 have "excludenl", a match with it will extend xPreProc to the next line as
|
|
446 before.
|
|
447
|
|
448 ==============================================================================
|
|
449 *44.8* Clusters
|
|
450
|
|
451 One of the things you will notice as you start to write a syntax file is that
|
|
452 you wind up generating a lot of syntax groups. Vim enables you to define a
|
|
453 collection of syntax groups called a cluster.
|
|
454 Suppose you have a language that contains for loops, if statements, while
|
|
455 loops, and functions. Each of them contains the same syntax elements: numbers
|
|
456 and identifiers. You define them like this: >
|
|
457
|
|
458 :syntax match xFor /^for.*/ contains=xNumber,xIdent
|
|
459 :syntax match xIf /^if.*/ contains=xNumber,xIdent
|
|
460 :syntax match xWhile /^while.*/ contains=xNumber,xIdent
|
|
461
|
|
462 You have to repeat the same "contains=" every time. If you want to add
|
|
463 another contained item, you have to add it three times. Syntax clusters
|
|
464 simplify these definitions by enabling you to have one cluster stand for
|
|
465 several syntax groups.
|
|
466 To define a cluster for the two items that the three groups contain, use
|
|
467 the following command: >
|
|
468
|
|
469 :syntax cluster xState contains=xNumber,xIdent
|
|
470
|
|
471 Clusters are used inside other syntax items just like any syntax group.
|
|
472 Their names start with @. Thus, you can define the three groups like this: >
|
|
473
|
|
474 :syntax match xFor /^for.*/ contains=@xState
|
|
475 :syntax match xIf /^if.*/ contains=@xState
|
|
476 :syntax match xWhile /^while.*/ contains=@xState
|
|
477
|
|
478 You can add new group names to this cluster with the "add" argument: >
|
|
479
|
|
480 :syntax cluster xState add=xString
|
|
481
|
|
482 You can remove syntax groups from this list as well: >
|
|
483
|
|
484 :syntax cluster xState remove=xNumber
|
|
485
|
|
486 ==============================================================================
|
|
487 *44.9* Including another syntax file
|
|
488
|
|
489 The C++ language syntax is a superset of the C language. Because you do not
|
|
490 want to write two syntax files, you can have the C++ syntax file read in the
|
|
491 one for C by using the following command: >
|
|
492
|
|
493 :runtime! syntax/c.vim
|
|
494
|
|
495 The ":runtime!" command searches 'runtimepath' for all "syntax/c.vim" files.
|
|
496 This makes the C syntax be defined like for C files. If you have replaced the
|
|
497 c.vim syntax file, or added items with an extra file, these will be loaded as
|
|
498 well.
|
|
499 After loading the C syntax items the specific C++ items can be defined.
|
|
500 For example, add keywords that are not used in C: >
|
|
501
|
|
502 :syntax keyword cppStatement new delete this friend using
|
|
503
|
|
504 This works just like in any other syntax file.
|
|
505
|
|
506 Now consider the Perl language. It consists of two distinct parts: a
|
|
507 documentation section in POD format, and a program written in Perl itself.
|
|
508 The POD section starts with "=head" and ends with "=cut".
|
|
509 You want to define the POD syntax in one file, and use it from the Perl
|
|
510 syntax file. The ":syntax include" command reads in a syntax file and stores
|
|
511 the elements it defined in a syntax cluster. For Perl, the statements are as
|
|
512 follows: >
|
|
513
|
|
514 :syntax include @Pod <sfile>:p:h/pod.vim
|
|
515 :syntax region perlPOD start=/^=head/ end=/^=cut/ contains=@Pod
|
|
516
|
|
517 When "=head" is found in a Perl file, the perlPOD region starts. In this
|
|
518 region the @Pod cluster is contained. All the items defined as top-level
|
|
519 items in the pod.vim syntax files will match here. When "=cut" is found, the
|
|
520 region ends and we go back to the items defined in the Perl file.
|
|
521 The ":syntax include" command is clever enough to ignore a ":syntax clear"
|
|
522 command in the included file. And an argument such as "contains=ALL" will
|
|
523 only contain items defined in the included file, not in the file that includes
|
|
524 it.
|
|
525 The "<sfile>:p:h/" part uses the name of the current file (<sfile>),
|
|
526 expands it to a full path (:p) and then takes the head (:h). This results in
|
|
527 the directory name of the file. This causes the pod.vim file in the same
|
|
528 directory to be included.
|
|
529
|
|
530 ==============================================================================
|
|
531 *44.10* Synchronizing
|
|
532
|
|
533 Compilers have it easy. They start at the beginning of a file and parse it
|
|
534 straight through. Vim does not have it so easy. It must start in the middle,
|
|
535 where the editing is being done. So how does it tell where it is?
|
|
536 The secret is the ":syntax sync" command. This tells Vim how to figure out
|
|
537 where it is. For example, the following command tells Vim to scan backward
|
|
538 for the beginning or end of a C-style comment and begin syntax coloring from
|
|
539 there: >
|
|
540
|
|
541 :syntax sync ccomment
|
|
542
|
|
543 You can tune this processing with some arguments. The "minlines" argument
|
|
544 tells Vim the minimum number of lines to look backward, and "maxlines" tells
|
|
545 the editor the maximum number of lines to scan.
|
|
546 For example, the following command tells Vim to look at least 10 lines
|
|
547 before the top of the screen: >
|
|
548
|
|
549 :syntax sync ccomment minlines=10 maxlines=500
|
|
550
|
|
551 If it cannot figure out where it is in that space, it starts looking farther
|
|
552 and farther back until it figures out what to do. But it looks no farther
|
236
|
553 back than 500 lines. (A large "maxlines" slows down processing. A small one
|
7
|
554 might cause synchronization to fail.)
|
|
555 To make synchronizing go a bit faster, tell Vim which syntax items can be
|
|
556 skipped. Every match and region that only needs to be used when actually
|
|
557 displaying text can be given the "display" argument.
|
|
558 By default, the comment to be found will be colored as part of the Comment
|
|
559 syntax group. If you want to color things another way, you can specify a
|
|
560 different syntax group: >
|
|
561
|
|
562 :syntax sync ccomment xAltComment
|
|
563
|
|
564 If your programming language does not have C-style comments in it, you can try
|
|
565 another method of synchronization. The simplest way is to tell Vim to space
|
|
566 back a number of lines and try to figure out things from there. The following
|
|
567 command tells Vim to go back 150 lines and start parsing from there: >
|
|
568
|
|
569 :syntax sync minlines=150
|
|
570
|
|
571 A large "minlines" value can make Vim slower, especially when scrolling
|
|
572 backwards in the file.
|
|
573 Finally, you can specify a syntax group to look for by using this command:
|
|
574 >
|
|
575 :syntax sync match {sync-group-name}
|
|
576 \ grouphere {group-name} {pattern}
|
|
577
|
|
578 This tells Vim that when it sees {pattern} the syntax group named {group-name}
|
|
579 begins just after the pattern given. The {sync-group-name} is used to give a
|
|
580 name to this synchronization specification. For example, the sh scripting
|
|
581 language begins an if statement with "if" and ends it with "fi":
|
|
582
|
|
583 if [ --f file.txt ] ; then ~
|
|
584 echo "File exists" ~
|
|
585 fi ~
|
|
586
|
|
587 To define a "grouphere" directive for this syntax, you use the following
|
|
588 command: >
|
|
589
|
|
590 :syntax sync match shIfSync grouphere shIf "\<if\>"
|
|
591
|
|
592 The "groupthere" argument tells Vim that the pattern ends a group. For
|
|
593 example, the end of the if/fi group is as follows: >
|
|
594
|
|
595 :syntax sync match shIfSync groupthere NONE "\<fi\>"
|
|
596
|
|
597 In this example, the NONE tells Vim that you are not in any special syntax
|
|
598 region. In particular, you are not inside an if block.
|
|
599
|
|
600 You also can define matches and regions that are with no "grouphere" or
|
|
601 "groupthere" arguments. These groups are for syntax groups skipped during
|
|
602 synchronization. For example, the following skips over anything inside {},
|
|
603 even if it would normally match another synchronization method: >
|
|
604
|
|
605 :syntax sync match xSpecial /{.*}/
|
|
606
|
|
607 More about synchronizing in the reference manual: |:syn-sync|.
|
|
608
|
|
609 ==============================================================================
|
|
610 *44.11* Installing a syntax file
|
|
611
|
|
612 When your new syntax file is ready to be used, drop it in a "syntax" directory
|
|
613 in 'runtimepath'. For Unix that would be "~/.vim/syntax".
|
|
614 The name of the syntax file must be equal to the file type, with ".vim"
|
|
615 added. Thus for the x language, the full path of the file would be:
|
|
616
|
|
617 ~/.vim/syntax/x.vim ~
|
|
618
|
|
619 You must also make the file type be recognized. See |43.2|.
|
|
620
|
|
621 If your file works well, you might want to make it available to other Vim
|
|
622 users. First read the next section to make sure your file works well for
|
|
623 others. Then e-mail it to the Vim maintainer: <maintainer@vim.org>. Also
|
|
624 explain how the filetype can be detected. With a bit of luck your file will
|
|
625 be included in the next Vim version!
|
|
626
|
|
627
|
|
628 ADDING TO AN EXISTING SYNTAX FILE
|
|
629
|
|
630 We were assuming you were adding a completely new syntax file. When an existing
|
|
631 syntax file works, but is missing some items, you can add items in a separate
|
|
632 file. That avoids changing the distributed syntax file, which will be lost
|
|
633 when installing a new version of Vim.
|
|
634 Write syntax commands in your file, possibly using group names from the
|
|
635 existing syntax. For example, to add new variable types to the C syntax file:
|
|
636 >
|
|
637 :syntax keyword cType off_t uint
|
|
638
|
|
639 Write the file with the same name as the original syntax file. In this case
|
|
640 "c.vim". Place it in a directory near the end of 'runtimepath'. This makes
|
|
641 it loaded after the original syntax file. For Unix this would be:
|
|
642
|
|
643 ~/.vim/after/syntax/c.vim ~
|
|
644
|
|
645 ==============================================================================
|
|
646 *44.12* Portable syntax file layout
|
|
647
|
|
648 Wouldn't it be nice if all Vim users exchange syntax files? To make this
|
|
649 possible, the syntax file must follow a few guidelines.
|
|
650
|
|
651 Start with a header that explains what the syntax file is for, who maintains
|
|
652 it and when it was last updated. Don't include too much information about
|
|
653 changes history, not many people will read it. Example: >
|
|
654
|
|
655 " Vim syntax file
|
|
656 " Language: C
|
|
657 " Maintainer: Bram Moolenaar <Bram@vim.org>
|
|
658 " Last Change: 2001 Jun 18
|
|
659 " Remark: Included by the C++ syntax.
|
|
660
|
|
661 Use the same layout as the other syntax files. Using an existing syntax file
|
|
662 as an example will save you a lot of time.
|
|
663
|
|
664 Choose a good, descriptive name for your syntax file. Use lowercase letters
|
|
665 and digits. Don't make it too long, it is used in many places: The name of
|
|
666 the syntax file "name.vim", 'filetype', b:current_syntax the start of each
|
|
667 syntax group (nameType, nameStatement, nameString, etc).
|
|
668
|
|
669 Start with a check for "b:current_syntax". If it is defined, some other
|
836
|
670 syntax file, earlier in 'runtimepath' was already loaded: >
|
|
671
|
|
672 if exists("b:current_syntax")
|
|
673 finish
|
|
674 endif
|
|
675
|
|
676 To be compatible with Vim 5.8 use: >
|
7
|
677
|
|
678 if version < 600
|
|
679 syntax clear
|
|
680 elseif exists("b:current_syntax")
|
|
681 finish
|
|
682 endif
|
|
683
|
|
684 Set "b:current_syntax" to the name of the syntax at the end. Don't forget
|
|
685 that included files do this too, you might have to reset "b:current_syntax" if
|
|
686 you include two files.
|
|
687
|
|
688 If you want your syntax file to work with Vim 5.x, add a check for v:version.
|
|
689 See yacc.vim for an example.
|
|
690
|
|
691 Do not include anything that is a user preference. Don't set 'tabstop',
|
|
692 'expandtab', etc. These belong in a filetype plugin.
|
|
693
|
|
694 Do not include mappings or abbreviations. Only include setting 'iskeyword' if
|
|
695 it is really necessary for recognizing keywords.
|
|
696
|
811
|
697 To allow users select their own preferred colors, make a different group name
|
|
698 for every kind of highlighted item. Then link each of them to one of the
|
|
699 standard highlight groups. That will make it work with every color scheme.
|
|
700 If you select specific colors it will look bad with some color schemes. And
|
|
701 don't forget that some people use a different background color, or have only
|
|
702 eight colors available.
|
7
|
703
|
811
|
704 For the linking use "hi def link", so that the user can select different
|
|
705 highlighting before your syntax file is loaded. Example: >
|
7
|
706
|
811
|
707 hi def link nameString String
|
|
708 hi def link nameNumber Number
|
|
709 hi def link nameCommand Statement
|
7
|
710 ... etc ...
|
|
711
|
|
712 Add the "display" argument to items that are not used when syncing, to speed
|
|
713 up scrolling backwards and CTRL-L.
|
|
714
|
|
715 ==============================================================================
|
|
716
|
|
717 Next chapter: |usr_45.txt| Select your language
|
|
718
|
|
719 Copyright: see |manual-copyright| vim:tw=78:ts=8:ft=help:norl:
|