patch 9.1.0171: Small split-move related improvements Commit: https://github.com/vim/vim/commit/5cac1a9bee0798d70a7fd80363a1f697759638e8 Author: Sean Dewar <6256228+seandewar@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Tue Mar 12 21:11:39 2024 +0100 patch 9.1.0171: Small split-move related improvements Problem: small improvements can be made to split-move related functions. Solution: apply them (Sean Dewar): - Improve some doc comments (frame_flatten should still work for non-current tabpages, despite the topframe check, which looks benign, though I'm unsure if it's still needed; see #2467). - f_win_splitmove should check_split_disallowed on wp, not targetwin, as that's what win_splitmove checks (though it's probably unnecessary to check b_locked_split at all; see #14109, which I hope to get around to finishing at some point). - Make winframe_restore restore window positions for the altframe, which winframe_remove changes. This doesn't affect the prior behaviour, as we called win_comp_pos after, but as win_comp_pos only works for curtab, and winframe_remove supports non-current tabpages, we should undo it. Regardless, this should mean we don't need win_comp_pos anymore; adjust tests to check that window positions remain unchanged. I'm not sure win_comp_pos is needed after last_status anyway if it doesn't steal rows from another frame to make room for a new statusline, which shouldn't be the case after winframe_remove? To be safe, I'll leave it as is. closes: #14185 Signed-off-by: Sean Dewar <6256228+seandewar@users.noreply.github.com> Signed-off-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>

Inserts 2 million lines with consecutive integers starting from 1
(essentially, the output of GNU's seq 1 2000000), writes them to Xtest
and writes its cksum to test.out.

We need 2 million lines to trigger a call to mf_hash_grow().  If it would mess
up the lines the checksum would differ.

cksum is part of POSIX and so should be available on most Unixes.
If it isn't available then the test will be skipped.

VMS does not have CKSUM but has a built in CHECKSUM - it should be used
STARTTEST
:silent! while 0
:  e! test.ok
:  w! test.out
:  qa!
:silent! endwhile
:if !has("vms")
: e! test.ok
: w! test.out
: qa!
:endif
:set fileformat=unix undolevels=-1
ggdG
:let i = 1
:while i <= 2000000 | call append(i, range(i, i + 99)) | let i += 100 | endwhile
ggdd
:w! Xtest.
:r !@test77a.com Xtest.
:s/\s/ /g
:set fileformat&
:.w! test.out
:qa!
ENDTEST