Mercurial > vim
view src/toolcheck @ 23318:c76240efdf02 v8.2.2204
patch 8.2.2204: Vim9: using -> both for method and lambda is confusing
Commit: https://github.com/vim/vim/commit/65c4415276394c871c7a8711c7633c19ec9235b1
Author: Bram Moolenaar <Bram@vim.org>
Date: Thu Dec 24 15:14:01 2020 +0100
patch 8.2.2204: Vim9: using -> both for method and lambda is confusing
Problem: Vim9: using -> both for method and lambda is confusing.
Solution: Use => for lambda in :def function.
author | Bram Moolenaar <Bram@vim.org> |
---|---|
date | Thu, 24 Dec 2020 15:15:05 +0100 |
parents | 3fc0f57ecb91 |
children |
line wrap: on
line source
#!/bin/sh # toolcheck -- check for tools that have severe bugs. Good that all the buggy # tools identify by version numbers. This is the spirit of GNU :-) # # 24.7.95 jw. retval=0 reply="`sh -version -c exit 2>&1 < /dev/null`" case "$reply" in GNU*1.14.3*) echo "- sh is '$reply'"; echo " CAUTION: This shell has a buggy 'trap' command."; echo " The configure script may fail silently."; retval=1; ;; GNU*) echo "- sh is '$reply' - probably OK."; ;; *) ;; esac reply="`sed --version 2>&1 < /dev/null`" case "$reply" in GNU\ sed\ version\ 2.0[34]) echo "- sed is '$reply'"; echo " CAUTION: This sed cannot configure screen properly." retval=1; ;; GNU\ sed\ version\ 2.05|GNU\ sed\ version\ 2.03\ kevin) echo "- sed is '$reply' - good."; ;; GNU*) echo "- sed is '$reply'."; ;; *) ;; esac exit $retval