runtime(java): Improve the recognition of the "style" method declarations Commit: https://github.com/vim/vim/commit/a4c085a3e607bd01d34e1db600b6460fc35fb0a3 Author: Aliaksei Budavei <0x000c70@gmail.com> Date: Wed Apr 24 21:04:25 2024 +0200 runtime(java): Improve the recognition of the "style" method declarations - Request the new regexp engine (v7.3.970) for [:upper:] and [:lower:]. - Recognise declarations of in-line annotated methods. - Recognise declarations of _strictfp_ methods. - Establish partial order for method modifiers as shown in the MethodModifier production; namely, _public_ and friends should be written the leftmost, possibly followed by _abstract_ or _default_, or possibly followed by other modifiers. - Stop looking for parameterisable primitive types (void<?>, int<Object>, etc., are malformed). - Stop looking for arrays of _void_. - Acknowledge the prevailing convention for method names to begin with a small letter and for class/interface names to begin with a capital letter; and, therefore, desist from claiming declarations of enum constants and constructors with javaFuncDef. Rationale: + Constructor is distinct from method: * its (overloaded) name is not arbitrary; * its return type is implicit; * its _throws_ clause depends on indirect vagaries of instance (variable) initialisers; * its invocation makes other constructors of its type hierarchy invoked one by one, concluding with the primordial constructor; * its explicit invocation, via _this_ or _super_, can only appear as the first statement in a constructor (not anymore, see JEP 447); else, its _super_ call cannot appear in constructors of _record_ or _enum_; and neither invocation is allowed for the primordial constructor; * it is not a member of its class, like initialisers, and is never inherited; * it is never _abstract_ or _native_. + Constructor declarations tend to be few in number and merit visual recognition from method declarations. + Enum constants define a fixed set of type instances and more resemble class variable initialisers. Note that the code duplicated for @javaFuncParams is written keeping in mind for g:java_highlight_functions a pending 3rd variant, which would require none of the :syn-cluster added groups. closes: #14620 Signed-off-by: Aliaksei Budavei <0x000c70@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>

/*
 * iscygpty.h -- part of ptycheck
 * https://github.com/k-takata/ptycheck
 *
 * Copyright (c) 2015-2017 K.Takata
 *
 * You can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of either
 * the MIT license (as described below) or the Vim license.
 *
 * Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining
 * a copy of this software and associated documentation files (the
 * "Software"), to deal in the Software without restriction, including
 * without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish,
 * distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies of the Software, and to
 * permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do so, subject to
 * the following conditions:
 *
 * The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be
 * included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
 *
 * THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND,
 * EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF
 * MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT.
 * IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY
 * CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT,
 * TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE
 * SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.
 */

#ifndef _ISCYGPTY_H
#define _ISCYGPTY_H

#ifdef _WIN32
int is_cygpty(int fd);
int is_cygpty_used(void);
#else
#define is_cygpty(fd)		0
#define is_cygpty_used()	0
#endif

#endif // _ISCYGPTY_H