Mercurial > vim
view src/toolcheck @ 26264:ce6490cd6282 v8.2.3663
patch 8.2.3663: using %S in printf() does not work correctly
Commit: https://github.com/vim/vim/commit/1f2453fec6f8f0f315f00ca7b562a02090cb1e37
Author: presuku <presuku@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Wed Nov 24 15:32:57 2021 +0000
patch 8.2.3663: using %S in printf() does not work correctly
Problem: Using %S in printf() does not work correctly.
Solution: Fix the problem and add more tests. (closes https://github.com/vim/vim/issues/9208)
author | Bram Moolenaar <Bram@vim.org> |
---|---|
date | Wed, 24 Nov 2021 16:45:03 +0100 |
parents | 3fc0f57ecb91 |
children |
line wrap: on
line source
#!/bin/sh # toolcheck -- check for tools that have severe bugs. Good that all the buggy # tools identify by version numbers. This is the spirit of GNU :-) # # 24.7.95 jw. retval=0 reply="`sh -version -c exit 2>&1 < /dev/null`" case "$reply" in GNU*1.14.3*) echo "- sh is '$reply'"; echo " CAUTION: This shell has a buggy 'trap' command."; echo " The configure script may fail silently."; retval=1; ;; GNU*) echo "- sh is '$reply' - probably OK."; ;; *) ;; esac reply="`sed --version 2>&1 < /dev/null`" case "$reply" in GNU\ sed\ version\ 2.0[34]) echo "- sed is '$reply'"; echo " CAUTION: This sed cannot configure screen properly." retval=1; ;; GNU\ sed\ version\ 2.05|GNU\ sed\ version\ 2.03\ kevin) echo "- sed is '$reply' - good."; ;; GNU*) echo "- sed is '$reply'."; ;; *) ;; esac exit $retval