view src/testdir/test_exec_while_if.vim @ 30594:586b5b3aacf9 v9.0.0632

patch 9.0.0632: calling a function from an "expr" option has overhead Commit: https://github.com/vim/vim/commit/87b4e5c5db9d1cfd6f2e79656e1a6cff3c69d15f Author: Bram Moolenaar <Bram@vim.org> Date: Sat Oct 1 15:32:46 2022 +0100 patch 9.0.0632: calling a function from an "expr" option has overhead Problem: Calling a function from an "expr" option has too much overhead. Solution: Add call_simple_func() and use it for 'foldexpr'
author Bram Moolenaar <Bram@vim.org>
date Sat, 01 Oct 2022 16:45:04 +0200
parents fb4c30606b4a
children
line wrap: on
line source

" Test for :execute, :while, :for and :if

func Test_exec_while_if()
  new

  let i = 0
  while i < 12
    let i = i + 1
    execute "normal o" . i . "\033"
    if i % 2
      normal Ax
      if i == 9
        break
      endif
      if i == 5
        continue
      else
        let j = 9
        while j > 0
          execute "normal" j . "a" . j . "\x1b"
          let j = j - 1
        endwhile
      endif
    endif
    if i == 9
      execute "normal Az\033"
    endif
  endwhile
  unlet i j

  call assert_equal(["",
        \ "1x999999999888888887777777666666555554444333221",
        \ "2",
        \ "3x999999999888888887777777666666555554444333221",
        \ "4",
        \ "5x",
        \ "6",
        \ "7x999999999888888887777777666666555554444333221",
        \ "8",
        \ "9x"], getline(1, 10))
endfunc

" vim: shiftwidth=2 sts=2 expandtab