Mercurial > vim
view src/proto/match.pro @ 31053:39f96b1e7b8d v9.0.0861
patch 9.0.0861: solution for "!!sort" in closed fold is not optimal
Commit: https://github.com/vim/vim/commit/9954dc39ea090cee6bf41c888c41e60d9f52c3b8
Author: Bram Moolenaar <Bram@vim.org>
Date: Fri Nov 11 22:58:36 2022 +0000
patch 9.0.0861: solution for "!!sort" in closed fold is not optimal
Problem: Solution for "!!sort" in closed fold is not optimal.
Solution: Use a different range instead of the subtle difference in handling
a range with an offset. (issue #11487)
| author | Bram Moolenaar <Bram@vim.org> |
|---|---|
| date | Sat, 12 Nov 2022 00:00:04 +0100 |
| parents | baec4e1cee43 |
| children |
line wrap: on
line source
/* match.c */ void clear_matches(win_T *wp); void init_search_hl(win_T *wp, match_T *search_hl); void prepare_search_hl(win_T *wp, match_T *search_hl, linenr_T lnum); int prepare_search_hl_line(win_T *wp, linenr_T lnum, colnr_T mincol, char_u **line, match_T *search_hl, int *search_attr); int update_search_hl(win_T *wp, linenr_T lnum, colnr_T col, char_u **line, match_T *search_hl, int *has_match_conc, int *match_conc, int did_line_attr, int lcs_eol_one, int *on_last_col); int get_prevcol_hl_flag(win_T *wp, match_T *search_hl, long curcol); void get_search_match_hl(win_T *wp, match_T *search_hl, long col, int *char_attr); void f_clearmatches(typval_T *argvars, typval_T *rettv); void f_getmatches(typval_T *argvars, typval_T *rettv); void f_setmatches(typval_T *argvars, typval_T *rettv); void f_matchadd(typval_T *argvars, typval_T *rettv); void f_matchaddpos(typval_T *argvars, typval_T *rettv); void f_matcharg(typval_T *argvars, typval_T *rettv); void f_matchdelete(typval_T *argvars, typval_T *rettv); void ex_match(exarg_T *eap); /* vim: set ft=c : */