view src/testdir/test_terminal_fail.vim @ 34379:37b4c89ba420 v9.1.0116

patch 9.1.0116: win_split_ins may not check available room Commit: https://github.com/vim/vim/commit/0fd44a5ad81ade342cb54d8984965bdedd2272c8 Author: Sean Dewar <6256228+seandewar@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Tue Feb 20 20:28:15 2024 +0100 patch 9.1.0116: win_split_ins may not check available room Problem: win_split_ins has no check for E36 when moving an existing window Solution: check for room and fix the issues in f_win_splitmove() (Sean Dewar) win_split_ins has no check for E36 when moving an existing window, allowing for layouts with many overlapping zero-sized windows to be created (which may also cause drawing issues with tablines and such). f_win_splitmove also has some bugs. So check for room and fix the issues in f_win_splitmove. Handle failure in the two relevant win_split_ins callers by restoring the original layout, and factor the common logic into win_splitmove. Don't check for room when opening an autocommand window, as it's a temporary window that's rarely interacted with or drawn anyhow, and is rather important for some autocommands. Issues fixed in f_win_splitmove: - Error if splitting is disallowed. - Fix heap-use-after-frees if autocommands fired from switching to "targetwin" close "wp" or "oldwin". - Fix splitting the wrong window if autocommands fired from switching to "targetwin" switch to a different window. - Ensure -1 is returned for all errors. Also handle allocation failure a bit earlier in make_snapshot (callers, except win_splitmove, don't really care if a snapshot can't be made, so just ignore the return value). Note: Test_smoothscroll_in_zero_width_window failed after these changes with E36, as it was using the previous behaviour to create a zero-width window. I've fixed the test such that it fails with UBSAN as expected when v9.0.1367 is reverted (and simplified it too). related: #14042 Signed-off-by: Sean Dewar <6256228+seandewar@users.noreply.github.com> Signed-off-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>
author Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>
date Tue, 20 Feb 2024 22:30:04 +0100
parents 08940efa6b4e
children
line wrap: on
line source

" This test is in a separate file, because it usually causes reports for memory
" leaks under valgrind.  That is because when fork/exec fails memory is not
" freed.  Since the process exits right away it's not a real leak.

source check.vim
CheckFeature terminal

source shared.vim

func Test_terminal_redir_fails()
  CheckUnix

  let buf = term_start('xyzabc', {'err_io': 'file', 'err_name': 'Xfile'})
  call TermWait(buf)
  call WaitFor('len(readfile("Xfile")) > 0')
  call assert_match('executing job failed', readfile('Xfile')[0])
  call WaitFor('!&modified')
  call delete('Xfile')
  bwipe
endfunc

" vim: shiftwidth=2 sts=2 expandtab