Mercurial > vim
view src/xpm_w32.c @ 34094:0b25a862bf0c v9.1.0014
patch 9.1.0014: incorrect use of W_WINROW in edit.c
Commit: https://github.com/vim/vim/commit/b1ed7ec9f7d1a0142d4f1c8c83bab9172bc92c7c
Author: zeertzjq <zeertzjq@outlook.com>
Date: Fri Jan 5 18:11:43 2024 +0100
patch 9.1.0014: incorrect use of W_WINROW in edit.c
Problem: incorrect use of W_WINROW in edit.c
Solution: compare against curwin->w_height instead
Remove incorrect use of W_WINROW
In structs.h it is mentioned that w_wrow is relative to w_winrow, so
using W_WINROW doesn't make sense when comparing with window height.
This change won't lead to any observable behavior change:
The condition intends to check if there are 'scrolloff' lines between
the current cursor when the bottom of the window. When W_WINROW(curwin)
is added to curwin->w_height - 1 - get_scrolloff_value(), the condition
is instead satisfied when the cursor is on some screen line below that
position. However,
- If 'scrolloff' is smaller than half the window height, this condition
can only be satisfied when W_WINROW(curwin) == 0. And if it is not
satisfied, update_topline() does the actual scrolling.
- If 'scrolloff' is larger than half the window height, update_topline()
will put the cursor at the center of the window soon afterwards
anyway, because set_topline() now unsets VALID_TOPLINE flag starting
from https://github.com/vim/vim-history/commit/7db7bb45b0f919ff0615d463ebd4fde881c69d1f.
To put it in another way, https://github.com/vim/vim-history/commit/7db7bb45b0f919ff0615d463ebd4fde881c69d1f
makes the update_topline() just below correct the mistakes made in this
block, so this incorrect use of W_WINROW() no longer affects observable
behavior.
closes: #12331
Signed-off-by: zeertzjq <zeertzjq@outlook.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>
author | Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org> |
---|---|
date | Fri, 05 Jan 2024 18:30:03 +0100 |
parents | 15539899a112 |
children |
line wrap: on
line source
/* vi:set ts=8 sts=4 sw=4 noet: * * Load XPM image. * * This function is placed in separate file because Xpm headers conflict with * Vim ones :( * * Written by Sergey Khorev. * http://iamphet.nm.ru/vim/index.html */ #ifndef WIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN # define WIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN #endif #include <windows.h> #include "xpm_w32.h" // Engage Windows support in libXpm #define FOR_MSW #include "xpm.h" /* * Tries to load an Xpm image from the file "filename". * Returns -1 on failure. * Returns 0 on success and stores image and mask BITMAPS in "hImage" and * "hShape". */ int LoadXpmImage( char *filename, HBITMAP *hImage, HBITMAP *hShape) { XImage *img; // loaded image XImage *shp; // shapeimage XpmAttributes attr; int res; HDC hdc = CreateCompatibleDC(NULL); attr.valuemask = 0; res = XpmReadFileToImage(&hdc, filename, &img, &shp, &attr); DeleteDC(hdc); if (res < 0) return -1; if (shp == NULL) { if (img) XDestroyImage(img); return -1; } *hImage = img->bitmap; *hShape = shp->bitmap; return 0; }