diff src/proto/list.pro @ 23604:1816ea68c022 v8.2.2344

patch 8.2.2344: using inclusive index for slice is not always desired Commit: https://github.com/vim/vim/commit/6601b62943a19d4f8818c3638440663d67a17b6a Author: Bram Moolenaar <Bram@vim.org> Date: Wed Jan 13 21:47:15 2021 +0100 patch 8.2.2344: using inclusive index for slice is not always desired Problem: Using inclusive index for slice is not always desired. Solution: Add the slice() method, which has an exclusive index. (closes #7408)
author Bram Moolenaar <Bram@vim.org>
date Wed, 13 Jan 2021 22:00:04 +0100
parents 510088f8c66f
children 525c9e218c69
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/src/proto/list.pro
+++ b/src/proto/list.pro
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ void f_flatten(typval_T *argvars, typval
 int list_extend(list_T *l1, list_T *l2, listitem_T *bef);
 int list_concat(list_T *l1, list_T *l2, typval_T *tv);
 list_T *list_slice(list_T *ol, long n1, long n2);
-int list_slice_or_index(list_T *list, int range, long n1_arg, long n2_arg, typval_T *rettv, int verbose);
+int list_slice_or_index(list_T *list, int range, varnumber_T n1_arg, varnumber_T n2_arg, int exclusive, typval_T *rettv, int verbose);
 list_T *list_copy(list_T *orig, int deep, int copyID);
 void vimlist_remove(list_T *l, listitem_T *item, listitem_T *item2);
 char_u *list2string(typval_T *tv, int copyID, int restore_copyID);