Mercurial > vim
diff src/proto/list.pro @ 23604:1816ea68c022 v8.2.2344
patch 8.2.2344: using inclusive index for slice is not always desired
Commit: https://github.com/vim/vim/commit/6601b62943a19d4f8818c3638440663d67a17b6a
Author: Bram Moolenaar <Bram@vim.org>
Date: Wed Jan 13 21:47:15 2021 +0100
patch 8.2.2344: using inclusive index for slice is not always desired
Problem: Using inclusive index for slice is not always desired.
Solution: Add the slice() method, which has an exclusive index. (closes
#7408)
author | Bram Moolenaar <Bram@vim.org> |
---|---|
date | Wed, 13 Jan 2021 22:00:04 +0100 |
parents | 510088f8c66f |
children | 525c9e218c69 |
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/src/proto/list.pro +++ b/src/proto/list.pro @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ void f_flatten(typval_T *argvars, typval int list_extend(list_T *l1, list_T *l2, listitem_T *bef); int list_concat(list_T *l1, list_T *l2, typval_T *tv); list_T *list_slice(list_T *ol, long n1, long n2); -int list_slice_or_index(list_T *list, int range, long n1_arg, long n2_arg, typval_T *rettv, int verbose); +int list_slice_or_index(list_T *list, int range, varnumber_T n1_arg, varnumber_T n2_arg, int exclusive, typval_T *rettv, int verbose); list_T *list_copy(list_T *orig, int deep, int copyID); void vimlist_remove(list_T *l, listitem_T *item, listitem_T *item2); char_u *list2string(typval_T *tv, int copyID, int restore_copyID);