comparison src/misc2.c @ 2232:2e6906bbc5f4 vim73

A few more fixes for undo file. Split test in two parts so that it doesn't fail with tiny features.
author Bram Moolenaar <bram@vim.org>
date Sun, 30 May 2010 13:26:21 +0200
parents aa6412cab544
children 6b4879aea261
comparison
equal deleted inserted replaced
2231:aa6412cab544 2232:2e6906bbc5f4
6258 time_t wtime = the_time; 6258 time_t wtime = the_time;
6259 6259
6260 /* time_t can be up to 8 bytes in size, more than long_u, thus we 6260 /* time_t can be up to 8 bytes in size, more than long_u, thus we
6261 * can't use put_bytes() here. 6261 * can't use put_bytes() here.
6262 * Another problem is that ">>" may do an arithmetic shift that keeps the 6262 * Another problem is that ">>" may do an arithmetic shift that keeps the
6263 * sign. A cast to long_u may truncate if time_t is 8 bytes. So only use 6263 * sign. This happens for large values of wtime. A cast to long_u may
6264 * a cast when it is 4 bytes, it's safe to assume that long_u is 4 bytes 6264 * truncate if time_t is 8 bytes. So only use a cast when it is 4 bytes,
6265 * or more and when using 8 bytes the top bit won't be set. */ 6265 * it's safe to assume that long_u is 4 bytes or more and when using 8
6266 * bytes the top bit won't be set. */
6266 for (i = 7; i >= 0; --i) 6267 for (i = 7; i >= 0; --i)
6267 { 6268 {
6268 if (i + 1 > (int)sizeof(time_t)) 6269 if (i + 1 > (int)sizeof(time_t))
6269 /* ">>" doesn't work well when shifting more bits than avail */ 6270 /* ">>" doesn't work well when shifting more bits than avail */
6270 putc(0, fd); 6271 putc(0, fd);
6271 else 6272 else
6272 { 6273 {
6273 /* use "i" in condition to avoid compiler warning */ 6274 #if defined(SIZEOF_TIME_T) && SIZEOF_TIME_T > 4
6274 if (i >= 0 && sizeof(time_t) > 4) 6275 c = wtime >> (i * 8);
6275 c = wtime >> (i * 8); 6276 #else
6276 else 6277 c = (long_u)wtime >> (i * 8);
6277 c = (long_u)wtime >> (i * 8); 6278 #endif
6278 putc(c, fd); 6279 putc(c, fd);
6279 } 6280 }
6280 } 6281 }
6281 } 6282 }
6282 6283