patch 9.0.2110: [security]: overflow in ex address parsing Commit: https://github.com/vim/vim/commit/060623e4a3bc72b011e7cd92bedb3bfb64e06200 Author: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org> Date: Tue Nov 14 21:33:29 2023 +0100 patch 9.0.2110: [security]: overflow in ex address parsing Problem: [security]: overflow in ex address parsing Solution: Verify that lnum is positive, before substracting from LONG_MAX [security]: overflow in ex address parsing When parsing relative ex addresses one may unintentionally cause an overflow (because LONG_MAX - lnum will overflow for negative addresses). So verify that lnum is actually positive before doing the overflow check. Signed-off-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>

/* XPM */
static char * tb_vsplit_xpm[] = {
/* width height ncolors cpp [x_hot y_hot] */
"18 18 5 1 0 0",
/* colors */
" 	s none	m none	c none",
".	s topShadowColor	m none	c #DCDEE5",
"X	s iconColor1	m black	c #000000",
"o	s iconColor2	m none	c #FFFFFF",
"O	s bottomShadowColor	m black	c #5D6069",
/* pixels */
"                  ",
" .XXXXXXXXXXXXXX  ",
" .X....oXO....oX  ",
" .X..o.oXO..o.oXO ",
" .X.oo.oXO.oo.oXO ",
" .X....oXO....oXO ",
" .X....oXO....oXO ",
" .X....oXO....oXO ",
" .X....oXO....oXO ",
" .X....oXO....oXO ",
" .X....oXO....oXO ",
" .X....oXO....oXO ",
" .X....oXO....oXO ",
" .X....oXO....oXO ",
" .XoooooXooooooXO ",
" .XXXXXXXXXXXXXXO ",
"    OOOOOOOOOOOOO ",
"                  "};