view pixmaps/tb_find_next.xpm @ 33865:8cdb69ea3711 v9.0.2143

patch 9.0.2143: [security]: buffer-overflow in ex_substitute Commit: https://github.com/vim/vim/commit/abfa13ebe92d81aaf66669c428d767847b577453 Author: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org> Date: Thu Nov 30 11:32:18 2023 +0100 patch 9.0.2143: [security]: buffer-overflow in ex_substitute Problem: [security]: buffer-overflow in ex_substitute Solution: clear memory after allocating When allocating the new_start pointer in ex_substitute() the memory pointer points to some garbage that the following for loop in ex_cmds.c:4743 confuses and causes it to accessing the new_start pointer beyond it's size, leading to a buffer-overlow. So fix this by using alloc_clear() instead of alloc(), which will clear the memory by NUL and therefore cause the loop to terminate correctly. Reported by @henices, thanks! closes: #13596 Signed-off-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>
author Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>
date Sun, 10 Dec 2023 15:16:05 +0100
parents 3fc0f57ecb91
children
line wrap: on
line source

/* XPM */
static char * tb_find_next_xpm[] = {
/* width height ncolors cpp [x_hot y_hot] */
"18 18 7 1 0 0",
/* colors */
" 	s none	m none	c none",
".	s iconColor1	m black	c #000000",
"X	s iconColor2	m none	c #FFFFFF",
"o	s iconGray2	m none	c #bdbdbd",
"O	m black	c #880000",
"+	s bottomShadowColor	m black	c #5D6069",
"@	s iconColor3	m black	c #FF0000",
/* pixels */
"                  ",
"  .........       ",
"  .XXXXXXX..      ",
"  .XXXXXXX.o.     ",
"  .XOXXXXX....    ",
"  +XOOXXXXXXX.    ",
"OOOOO@OXXX....    ",
"O@@@@@@OX.oooo.   ",
"O@@@@@@@OoXXooo.  ",
"O@@@@@@O.oXoooo.  ",
"OOOOO@OX.oooooo.  ",
"  +XOOXX.oooXoo.  ",
"  .XOXXXX.oooo.+  ",
"  .XXXXXXX....+.. ",
"  .XXXXXXXXXX.+...",
"  ............+ ..",
"     ++++++++++   ",
"                  "};