Mercurial > vim
view src/testdir/test_hide.vim @ 33988:7c30841c60a0 v9.0.2180
patch 9.0.2180: POSIX function name in exarg causes issues
Commit: https://github.com/vim/vim/commit/6fdb6280821a822768df5689a5d727e37d38306c
Author: Zoltan Arpadffy <zoltan.arpadffy@gmail.com>
Date: Tue Dec 19 20:53:07 2023 +0100
patch 9.0.2180: POSIX function name in exarg causes issues
Problem: POSIX function name in exarg struct causes issues
on OpenVMS
Solution: Rename getline member in exarg struct to ea_getline,
remove isinf() workaround for VMS
There are compilers that do not treat well POSIX functions - like
getline - usage in the structs.
Older VMS compilers could digest this... but the newer OpenVMS compilers
( like VSI C x86-64 X7.4-843 (GEM 50XB9) ) cannot deal with these
structs. This could be limited to getline() that is defined via
getdelim() and might not affect all POSIX functions in general - but
avoiding POSIX function names usage in the structs is a "safe side"
practice without compromising the functionality or the code readability.
The previous OpenVMS X86 port used a workaround limiting the compiler
capabilities using __CRTL_VER_OVERRIDE=80400000
In order to make the OpenVMS port future proof, this pull request
proposes a possible solution.
closes: #13704
Signed-off-by: Zoltan Arpadffy <zoltan.arpadffy@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>
author | Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org> |
---|---|
date | Tue, 19 Dec 2023 21:00:04 +0100 |
parents | e373843e2980 |
children |
line wrap: on
line source
" Tests for :hide command/modifier and 'hidden' option func SetUp() let s:save_hidden = &hidden let s:save_bufhidden = &bufhidden let s:save_autowrite = &autowrite set nohidden set bufhidden= set noautowrite endfunc function TearDown() let &hidden = s:save_hidden let &bufhidden = s:save_bufhidden let &autowrite = s:save_autowrite endfunc function Test_hide() let orig_bname = bufname('') let orig_winnr = winnr('$') new Xf1 set modified call assert_fails('edit Xf2') bwipeout! Xf1 new Xf1 set modified edit! Xf2 call assert_equal(['Xf2', 2], [bufname(''), winnr('$')]) call assert_equal([1, 0], [buflisted('Xf1'), bufloaded('Xf1')]) bwipeout! Xf1 bwipeout! Xf2 new Xf1 set modified " :hide as a command hide call assert_equal([orig_bname, orig_winnr], [bufname(''), winnr('$')]) call assert_equal([1, 1], ['Xf1'->buflisted(), 'Xf1'->bufloaded()]) bwipeout! Xf1 new Xf1 set modified " :hide as a command with trailing comment hide " comment call assert_equal([orig_bname, orig_winnr], [bufname(''), winnr('$')]) call assert_equal([1, 1], [buflisted('Xf1'), bufloaded('Xf1')]) bwipeout! Xf1 new Xf1 set modified " :hide as a command with bar hide | new Xf2 " comment call assert_equal(['Xf2', 2], [bufname(''), winnr('$')]) call assert_equal([1, 1], [buflisted('Xf1'), bufloaded('Xf1')]) bwipeout! Xf1 bwipeout! Xf2 new Xf1 set modified " :hide as a modifier with trailing comment hide edit Xf2 " comment call assert_equal(['Xf2', 2], [bufname(''), winnr('$')]) call assert_equal([1, 1], [buflisted('Xf1'), bufloaded('Xf1')]) bwipeout! Xf1 bwipeout! Xf2 new Xf1 set modified " To check that the bar is not recognized to separate commands hide echo "one|two" call assert_equal(['Xf1', 2], [bufname(''), winnr('$')]) call assert_equal([1, 1], [buflisted('Xf1'), bufloaded('Xf1')]) bwipeout! Xf1 " set hidden new Xf1 set hidden set modified edit Xf2 " comment call assert_equal(['Xf2', 2], [bufname(''), winnr('$')]) call assert_equal([1, 1], [buflisted('Xf1'), bufloaded('Xf1')]) bwipeout! Xf1 bwipeout! Xf2 " set hidden bufhidden=wipe new Xf1 set bufhidden=wipe set modified hide edit! Xf2 " comment call assert_equal(['Xf2', 2], [bufname(''), winnr('$')]) call assert_equal([0, 0], [buflisted('Xf1'), bufloaded('Xf1')]) bwipeout! Xf2 endfunc " vim: shiftwidth=2 sts=2 expandtab