Mercurial > vim
view src/testdir/test_changedtick.vim @ 33988:7c30841c60a0 v9.0.2180
patch 9.0.2180: POSIX function name in exarg causes issues
Commit: https://github.com/vim/vim/commit/6fdb6280821a822768df5689a5d727e37d38306c
Author: Zoltan Arpadffy <zoltan.arpadffy@gmail.com>
Date: Tue Dec 19 20:53:07 2023 +0100
patch 9.0.2180: POSIX function name in exarg causes issues
Problem: POSIX function name in exarg struct causes issues
on OpenVMS
Solution: Rename getline member in exarg struct to ea_getline,
remove isinf() workaround for VMS
There are compilers that do not treat well POSIX functions - like
getline - usage in the structs.
Older VMS compilers could digest this... but the newer OpenVMS compilers
( like VSI C x86-64 X7.4-843 (GEM 50XB9) ) cannot deal with these
structs. This could be limited to getline() that is defined via
getdelim() and might not affect all POSIX functions in general - but
avoiding POSIX function names usage in the structs is a "safe side"
practice without compromising the functionality or the code readability.
The previous OpenVMS X86 port used a workaround limiting the compiler
capabilities using __CRTL_VER_OVERRIDE=80400000
In order to make the OpenVMS port future proof, this pull request
proposes a possible solution.
closes: #13704
Signed-off-by: Zoltan Arpadffy <zoltan.arpadffy@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>
| author | Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org> |
|---|---|
| date | Tue, 19 Dec 2023 21:00:04 +0100 |
| parents | 08940efa6b4e |
| children |
line wrap: on
line source
" Tests for b:changedtick func Test_changedtick_increments() new " New buffer has an empty line, tick starts at 2. let expected = 2 call assert_equal(expected, b:changedtick) call assert_equal(expected, b:['changedtick']) call setline(1, 'hello') let expected += 1 call assert_equal(expected, b:changedtick) call assert_equal(expected, b:['changedtick']) undo " Somehow undo counts as two changes. let expected += 2 call assert_equal(expected, b:changedtick) call assert_equal(expected, b:['changedtick']) bwipe! endfunc func Test_changedtick_dict_entry() let d = b: call assert_equal(b:changedtick, d['changedtick']) endfunc func Test_changedtick_bdel() new let bnr = bufnr('%') let v = b:changedtick bdel " Delete counts as a change too. call assert_equal(v + 1, getbufvar(bnr, 'changedtick')) endfunc func Test_changedtick_islocked() call assert_equal(0, islocked('b:changedtick')) let d = b: call assert_equal(0, islocked('d.changedtick')) endfunc func Test_changedtick_fixed() call assert_fails('let b:changedtick = 4', 'E46:') call assert_fails('let b:["changedtick"] = 4', 'E46:') call assert_fails('lockvar b:changedtick', 'E940:') call assert_fails('lockvar b:["changedtick"]', 'E46:') call assert_fails('unlockvar b:changedtick', 'E940:') call assert_fails('unlockvar b:["changedtick"]', 'E46:') call assert_fails('unlet b:changedtick', 'E795:') call assert_fails('unlet b:["changedtick"]', 'E46:') let d = b: call assert_fails('lockvar d["changedtick"]', 'E46:') call assert_fails('unlockvar d["changedtick"]', 'E46:') call assert_fails('unlet d["changedtick"]', 'E46:') endfunc func Test_changedtick_not_incremented_with_write() new let fname = "XChangeTick" exe 'w ' .. fname " :write when the buffer is not changed does not increment changedtick let expected = b:changedtick w call assert_equal(expected, b:changedtick) " :write when the buffer IS changed DOES increment changedtick let expected = b:changedtick + 1 setlocal modified w call assert_equal(expected, b:changedtick) " Two ticks: change + write let expected = b:changedtick + 2 call setline(1, 'hello') w call assert_equal(expected, b:changedtick) " Two ticks: start insert + write let expected = b:changedtick + 2 normal! o w call assert_equal(expected, b:changedtick) " Three ticks: start insert + change + write let expected = b:changedtick + 3 normal! ochanged w call assert_equal(expected, b:changedtick) bwipe call delete(fname) endfunc " vim: shiftwidth=2 sts=2 expandtab