patch 9.0.2180: POSIX function name in exarg causes issues Commit: https://github.com/vim/vim/commit/6fdb6280821a822768df5689a5d727e37d38306c Author: Zoltan Arpadffy <zoltan.arpadffy@gmail.com> Date: Tue Dec 19 20:53:07 2023 +0100 patch 9.0.2180: POSIX function name in exarg causes issues Problem: POSIX function name in exarg struct causes issues on OpenVMS Solution: Rename getline member in exarg struct to ea_getline, remove isinf() workaround for VMS There are compilers that do not treat well POSIX functions - like getline - usage in the structs. Older VMS compilers could digest this... but the newer OpenVMS compilers ( like VSI C x86-64 X7.4-843 (GEM 50XB9) ) cannot deal with these structs. This could be limited to getline() that is defined via getdelim() and might not affect all POSIX functions in general - but avoiding POSIX function names usage in the structs is a "safe side" practice without compromising the functionality or the code readability. The previous OpenVMS X86 port used a workaround limiting the compiler capabilities using __CRTL_VER_OVERRIDE=80400000 In order to make the OpenVMS port future proof, this pull request proposes a possible solution. closes: #13704 Signed-off-by: Zoltan Arpadffy <zoltan.arpadffy@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>

| +0&#ffffff0@74
|[+1&&|N|o| |N|a|m|e|]| @65
|:+0#4040ff13&|s+0#af5f00255&|e|t| +0#0000000&|w+0#e000e06&|i|l|d|m|o|d|e|=+0#0000000&|l|o|n|g|e|s|t|,+0#af5f00255&|f+0#0000000&|u|l@1| @48
|:+0#4040ff13&|s+0#af5f00255&|e|t| +0#0000000&|w+0#e000e06&|i|l|d|m|o|d|e|=+0#0000000&|f|u|l@1| @56
|:+0#4040ff13&|s+0#af5f00255&|i|g|n| +0#0000000&|d|e|f|i|n|e| @62
|:+0#4040ff13&|s+0#af5f00255&|i|g|n| +0#0000000&|d|e|f|i|n|e> @62
|~+0#4040ff13&| @73
|~| @73
|[+3#0000000&|C|o|m@1|a|n|d| |L|i|n|e|]| @60
|Y+0#0000001#ffff4012|o|u| |d|i|s|c|o|v|e|r|e|d| |t|h|e| |c|o|m@1|a|n|d|-|l|i|n|e| |w|i|n|d|o|w|!| |Y|o|u| |c|a|n| |c|l|o|s|e| |i|t| |w|i|t|h| |"|:|q|"|.| +0#0000000#ffffff0@7