patch 9.0.2180: POSIX function name in exarg causes issues Commit: https://github.com/vim/vim/commit/6fdb6280821a822768df5689a5d727e37d38306c Author: Zoltan Arpadffy <zoltan.arpadffy@gmail.com> Date: Tue Dec 19 20:53:07 2023 +0100 patch 9.0.2180: POSIX function name in exarg causes issues Problem: POSIX function name in exarg struct causes issues on OpenVMS Solution: Rename getline member in exarg struct to ea_getline, remove isinf() workaround for VMS There are compilers that do not treat well POSIX functions - like getline - usage in the structs. Older VMS compilers could digest this... but the newer OpenVMS compilers ( like VSI C x86-64 X7.4-843 (GEM 50XB9) ) cannot deal with these structs. This could be limited to getline() that is defined via getdelim() and might not affect all POSIX functions in general - but avoiding POSIX function names usage in the structs is a "safe side" practice without compromising the functionality or the code readability. The previous OpenVMS X86 port used a workaround limiting the compiler capabilities using __CRTL_VER_OVERRIDE=80400000 In order to make the OpenVMS port future proof, this pull request proposes a possible solution. closes: #13704 Signed-off-by: Zoltan Arpadffy <zoltan.arpadffy@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>

|h+0&#ffd7ff255|e| |m|i|d@1|l|e| | +0&#ffffff0|t+0&#ffd7ff255|h|e| |l|a|s|t| |o|n|e| |t|h|e| |l|a|s|t| |o|n|e| |t|h|e| |l|a|s|t| |o|n|e| | +0&#ffffff0@9
|4|3| |4@1| |4|5| |4|6| |4|7| |4|8| |4|9| |5|0| |5|1| |5|2| >5|3| |5|4| |5@1| |5|6| |5|7| |5|8| |5|9| |6|0| |6|1| |6|2| 
@60
@60
|~+0#4040ff13&| @58
|~| @58
|~| @58
| +0#0000000&@41|2|,|1|5|0| @8|A|l@1|