Mercurial > vim
view src/testdir/dumps/Test_smoothscroll_cursor_top.dump @ 33988:7c30841c60a0 v9.0.2180
patch 9.0.2180: POSIX function name in exarg causes issues
Commit: https://github.com/vim/vim/commit/6fdb6280821a822768df5689a5d727e37d38306c
Author: Zoltan Arpadffy <zoltan.arpadffy@gmail.com>
Date: Tue Dec 19 20:53:07 2023 +0100
patch 9.0.2180: POSIX function name in exarg causes issues
Problem: POSIX function name in exarg struct causes issues
on OpenVMS
Solution: Rename getline member in exarg struct to ea_getline,
remove isinf() workaround for VMS
There are compilers that do not treat well POSIX functions - like
getline - usage in the structs.
Older VMS compilers could digest this... but the newer OpenVMS compilers
( like VSI C x86-64 X7.4-843 (GEM 50XB9) ) cannot deal with these
structs. This could be limited to getline() that is defined via
getdelim() and might not affect all POSIX functions in general - but
avoiding POSIX function names usage in the structs is a "safe side"
practice without compromising the functionality or the code readability.
The previous OpenVMS X86 port used a workaround limiting the compiler
capabilities using __CRTL_VER_OVERRIDE=80400000
In order to make the OpenVMS port future proof, this pull request
proposes a possible solution.
closes: #13704
Signed-off-by: Zoltan Arpadffy <zoltan.arpadffy@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>
author | Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org> |
---|---|
date | Tue, 19 Dec 2023 21:00:04 +0100 |
parents | 6e4bf51ec635 |
children |
line wrap: on
line source
| +0&#ffffff0@39 |[+1&&|N|o| |N|a|m|e|]| @30 |l+0&&|i|n|e|1| @34 |l|i|n|e|2| @34 >l|i|n|e|3|l|i|n|e|3|l|i|n|e|3|l|i|n|e|3|l|i|n|e|3|l|i|n|e|3|l|i|n|e|3|l|i|n|e|3 |l|i|n|e|3|l|i|n|e|3|l|i|n|e|3|l|i|n|e|3|l|i|n|e|3|l|i|n|e|3|l|i|n|e|3|l|i|n|e|3 |l|i|n|e|3|l|i|n|e|3|l|i|n|e|3|l|i|n|e|3| @19 |l|i|n|e|4| @34 |~+0#4040ff13&| @38 |~| @38 |[+3#0000000&|N|o| |N|a|m|e|]| |[|+|]| @26 | +0&&@39