Mercurial > vim
view src/testdir/dumps/Test_prop_inserts_text_visual_block_2.dump @ 33988:7c30841c60a0 v9.0.2180
patch 9.0.2180: POSIX function name in exarg causes issues
Commit: https://github.com/vim/vim/commit/6fdb6280821a822768df5689a5d727e37d38306c
Author: Zoltan Arpadffy <zoltan.arpadffy@gmail.com>
Date: Tue Dec 19 20:53:07 2023 +0100
patch 9.0.2180: POSIX function name in exarg causes issues
Problem: POSIX function name in exarg struct causes issues
on OpenVMS
Solution: Rename getline member in exarg struct to ea_getline,
remove isinf() workaround for VMS
There are compilers that do not treat well POSIX functions - like
getline - usage in the structs.
Older VMS compilers could digest this... but the newer OpenVMS compilers
( like VSI C x86-64 X7.4-843 (GEM 50XB9) ) cannot deal with these
structs. This could be limited to getline() that is defined via
getdelim() and might not affect all POSIX functions in general - but
avoiding POSIX function names usage in the structs is a "safe side"
practice without compromising the functionality or the code readability.
The previous OpenVMS X86 port used a workaround limiting the compiler
capabilities using __CRTL_VER_OVERRIDE=80400000
In order to make the OpenVMS port future proof, this pull request
proposes a possible solution.
closes: #13704
Signed-off-by: Zoltan Arpadffy <zoltan.arpadffy@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>
author | Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org> |
---|---|
date | Tue, 19 Dec 2023 21:00:04 +0100 |
parents | 7a1a9ce831c3 |
children | 47385c831d92 |
line wrap: on
line source
|1+0&#e0e0e08|2|3+0&#ffffff0|4|5|6|7|8|9| @50 |1+0&#e0e0e08|-+0#e000e06#ffffff0|口*&|-+&|2+0#0000000&|3|4|5|6|7|8|9| @46 |1+0&#e0e0e08|2|口*0#e000e06#ffffff0|3+0#0000000&|4|5|6|7|8|9| @48 |1+0&#e0e0e08>2+0&#ffffff0|3|4|5|6|7|8|9| @50 |~+0#4040ff13&| @58 |-+2#0000000&@1| |V|I|S|U|A|L| |B|L|O|C|K| |-@1| +0&&@13|4|x|2| @6|4|,|2| @10|A|l@1|