view pixmaps/tb_ctags.xpm @ 33988:7c30841c60a0 v9.0.2180

patch 9.0.2180: POSIX function name in exarg causes issues Commit: https://github.com/vim/vim/commit/6fdb6280821a822768df5689a5d727e37d38306c Author: Zoltan Arpadffy <zoltan.arpadffy@gmail.com> Date: Tue Dec 19 20:53:07 2023 +0100 patch 9.0.2180: POSIX function name in exarg causes issues Problem: POSIX function name in exarg struct causes issues on OpenVMS Solution: Rename getline member in exarg struct to ea_getline, remove isinf() workaround for VMS There are compilers that do not treat well POSIX functions - like getline - usage in the structs. Older VMS compilers could digest this... but the newer OpenVMS compilers ( like VSI C x86-64 X7.4-843 (GEM 50XB9) ) cannot deal with these structs. This could be limited to getline() that is defined via getdelim() and might not affect all POSIX functions in general - but avoiding POSIX function names usage in the structs is a "safe side" practice without compromising the functionality or the code readability. The previous OpenVMS X86 port used a workaround limiting the compiler capabilities using __CRTL_VER_OVERRIDE=80400000 In order to make the OpenVMS port future proof, this pull request proposes a possible solution. closes: #13704 Signed-off-by: Zoltan Arpadffy <zoltan.arpadffy@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>
author Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>
date Tue, 19 Dec 2023 21:00:04 +0100
parents 3fc0f57ecb91
children
line wrap: on
line source

/* XPM */
static char * tb_ctags_xpm[] = {
/* width height ncolors cpp [x_hot y_hot] */
"18 18 7 1 0 0",
/* colors */
" 	s none	m none	c none",
".	s iconColor1	m black	c #000000",
"X	s iconColor2	m none	c #FFFFFF",
"o	s bottomShadowColor	m black	c #5D6069",
"O	m black	c #888800",
"+	s topShadowColor	m none	c #DCDEE5",
"@	s iconColor6	m none	c #FFFF00",
/* pixels */
"     .. .....     ",
"    .XX.XXXXX.    ",
"    .XXXXXXXXX.   ",
"    .XX.XXXX..X.  ",
"     .. ....o ..  ",
"   OO++O+...+O+.+ ",
"  Oo@@@@@...o@@@.o",
" Oo@@@@@@...o@@@.o",
"Oo@+o+@@@...o@@@.o",
"O@@o.o@@@...o@@@.o",
"o@@+o+@@@...o@@@.o",
"o.@@@@@@@...o@@@.o",
" o.@@@@@@...o@@@.o",
"  o.........o....o",
"   oooooo...oooooo",
"         ...o     ",
"         ...o     ",
"          ooo     "};