Mercurial > vim
view src/testdir/test108.ok @ 15973:393a9a3a2da2 v8.1.0992
patch 8.1.0992: a :normal command resets the reg_executing() result
commit https://github.com/vim/vim/commit/cce713ddcc0c9ab29926c28e287cbb587a959b08
Author: Bram Moolenaar <Bram@vim.org>
Date: Mon Mar 4 11:40:12 2019 +0100
patch 8.1.0992: a :normal command resets the reg_executing() result
Problem: A :normal command while executing a register resets the
reg_executing() result.
Solution: Save and restore reg_executing. (closes #4066)
author | Bram Moolenaar <Bram@vim.org> |
---|---|
date | Mon, 04 Mar 2019 11:45:07 +0100 |
parents | a527110d5f56 |
children |
line wrap: on
line source
- show backtrace: 2 function Foo[2] 1 Bar[2] ->0 Bazz line 2: let var3 = "another var" show variables on different levels: 6 2 function Foo[2] ->1 Bar[2] 0 Bazz line 2: let var3 = "another var" 3 ->2 function Foo[2] 1 Bar[2] 0 Bazz line 2: let var3 = "another var" 1 - undefined vars: undefined var3 on former level: Error detected while processing function Foo[2]..Bar[2]..Bazz: line 3: E121: Undefined variable: var3 here var3 is defined with "another var": another var undefined var2 on former level Error detected while processing function Foo[2]..Bar: line 3: E121: Undefined variable: var2 here var2 is defined with 10: 10 - backtrace movements: 1 function Foo[2] ->0 Bar line 3: End of function next command cannot go down, we are on bottom frame is zero next command cannot go up, we are on top frame at highest level: 1 ->1 function Foo[2] 0 Bar line 3: End of function fil is not frame or finish, it is file "[No Name]" --No lines in buffer-- - relative backtrace movement 1 function Foo[2] ->0 Bar line 3: End of function ->1 function Foo[2] 0 Bar line 3: End of function - go beyond limits does not crash frame at highest level: 1 ->1 function Foo[2] 0 Bar line 3: End of function frame is zero 1 function Foo[2] ->0 Bar line 3: End of function - final result 19: 19