diff runtime/doc/vim9class.txt @ 32294:b2e8663e6dcc

Update runtime files Commit: https://github.com/vim/vim/commit/71badf9547e8f89571b9a095183671cbb333d528 Author: Bram Moolenaar <Bram@vim.org> Date: Sat Apr 22 22:40:14 2023 +0100 Update runtime files
author Bram Moolenaar <Bram@vim.org>
date Sat, 22 Apr 2023 23:45:05 +0200
parents b2412874362f
children 54c01bb98b8e
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/runtime/doc/vim9class.txt
+++ b/runtime/doc/vim9class.txt
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-*vim9class.txt*	For Vim version 9.0.  Last change: 2023 Feb 26
+*vim9class.txt*	For Vim version 9.0.  Last change: 2023 Mar 22
 
 
 		  VIM REFERENCE MANUAL	  by Bram Moolenaar
@@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ new() call is assigned to that object me
 Dart language.
 
 Putting together this way of using new() and making the members public results
-in a much shorter class definition as what we started with: >
+in a much shorter class definition than what we started with: >
 
 	class TextPosition
 	   public this.lnum: number
@@ -526,7 +526,7 @@ When a variable is declared to have the 
 initialized, the value is null.  When trying to use this null object Vim often
 does not know what class was supposed to be used.  Vim then cannot check if
 a member name is correct and you will get an "Using a null object" error,
-even when the member name is invalid. *E1360* *E1362*
+even when the member name is invalid. *E1360* *E1362* *E1363*
 
 
 Default constructor ~
@@ -872,8 +872,8 @@ Especially when refactoring or other cha
 
 The Vim scripts are expected to be used in a plugin, with just one person or a
 small team working on it.  Complex rules then only make it more complicated,
-the extra safety provide by the rules isn't really needed.  Let's just keep it
-simple and not specify access details.
+the extra safety provided by the rules isn't really needed.  Let's just keep
+it simple and not specify access details.
 
 
 ==============================================================================