diff src/eval.c @ 21022:9d8634e91d1b v8.2.1062

patch 8.2.1062: Vim9: no line break allowed inside "cond ? val1 : val2" Commit: https://github.com/vim/vim/commit/793648fb563359396a23740c72a6e04cb64df3a9 Author: Bram Moolenaar <Bram@vim.org> Date: Fri Jun 26 21:28:25 2020 +0200 patch 8.2.1062: Vim9: no line break allowed inside "cond ? val1 : val2" Problem: Vim9: no line break allowed inside "cond ? val1 : val2". Solution: Check for operator after line break.
author Bram Moolenaar <Bram@vim.org>
date Fri, 26 Jun 2020 21:30:06 +0200
parents 4852db420162
children 02b03915855d
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/src/eval.c
+++ b/src/eval.c
@@ -1892,13 +1892,17 @@ eval0(
     int
 eval1(char_u **arg, typval_T *rettv, evalarg_T *evalarg)
 {
+    char_u  *p;
+    int	    getnext;
+
     /*
      * Get the first variable.
      */
     if (eval2(arg, rettv, evalarg) == FAIL)
 	return FAIL;
 
-    if ((*arg)[0] == '?')
+    p = eval_next_non_blank(*arg, evalarg, &getnext);
+    if (*p == '?')
     {
 	int		result;
 	typval_T	var2;
@@ -1906,6 +1910,9 @@ eval1(char_u **arg, typval_T *rettv, eva
 	int		orig_flags;
 	int		evaluate;
 
+	if (getnext)
+	    *arg = eval_next_line(evalarg);
+
 	if (evalarg == NULL)
 	{
 	    CLEAR_FIELD(nested_evalarg);
@@ -1942,13 +1949,16 @@ eval1(char_u **arg, typval_T *rettv, eva
 	/*
 	 * Check for the ":".
 	 */
-	if ((*arg)[0] != ':')
+	p = eval_next_non_blank(*arg, evalarg, &getnext);
+	if (*p != ':')
 	{
 	    emsg(_(e_missing_colon));
 	    if (evaluate && result)
 		clear_tv(rettv);
 	    return FAIL;
 	}
+	if (getnext)
+	    *arg = eval_next_line(evalarg);
 
 	/*
 	 * Get the third variable.  Recursive!