comparison src/undo.c @ 12827:ff494a964ab7 v8.0.1290

patch 8.0.1290: seq_cur of undotree() wrong after undo commit https://github.com/vim/vim/commit/80eaddd3a0bc47cb14168964678420cfe03a2502 Author: Bram Moolenaar <Bram@vim.org> Date: Sat Nov 11 23:37:08 2017 +0100 patch 8.0.1290: seq_cur of undotree() wrong after undo Problem: seq_cur of undotree() wrong after undo. Solution: Get the actual sequence number instead of decrementing the current one. (Ozaki Kiichi, closes #2319)
author Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>
date Sat, 11 Nov 2017 23:45:05 +0100
parents 351cf7c67bbe
children 8d5b451d7bab
comparison
equal deleted inserted replaced
12826:f690da1b3c04 12827:ff494a964ab7
2861 check_cursor(); 2861 check_cursor();
2862 2862
2863 /* Remember where we are for "g-" and ":earlier 10s". */ 2863 /* Remember where we are for "g-" and ":earlier 10s". */
2864 curbuf->b_u_seq_cur = curhead->uh_seq; 2864 curbuf->b_u_seq_cur = curhead->uh_seq;
2865 if (undo) 2865 if (undo)
2866 {
2866 /* We are below the previous undo. However, to make ":earlier 1s" 2867 /* We are below the previous undo. However, to make ":earlier 1s"
2867 * work we compute this as being just above the just undone change. */ 2868 * work we compute this as being just above the just undone change. */
2868 --curbuf->b_u_seq_cur; 2869 if (curhead->uh_next.ptr != NULL)
2870 curbuf->b_u_seq_cur = curhead->uh_next.ptr->uh_seq;
2871 else
2872 curbuf->b_u_seq_cur = 0;
2873 }
2869 2874
2870 /* Remember where we are for ":earlier 1f" and ":later 1f". */ 2875 /* Remember where we are for ":earlier 1f" and ":later 1f". */
2871 if (curhead->uh_save_nr != 0) 2876 if (curhead->uh_save_nr != 0)
2872 { 2877 {
2873 if (undo) 2878 if (undo)