comparison src/ex_docmd.c @ 33780:377ed6ab612c v9.0.2110

patch 9.0.2110: [security]: overflow in ex address parsing Commit: https://github.com/vim/vim/commit/060623e4a3bc72b011e7cd92bedb3bfb64e06200 Author: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org> Date: Tue Nov 14 21:33:29 2023 +0100 patch 9.0.2110: [security]: overflow in ex address parsing Problem: [security]: overflow in ex address parsing Solution: Verify that lnum is positive, before substracting from LONG_MAX [security]: overflow in ex address parsing When parsing relative ex addresses one may unintentionally cause an overflow (because LONG_MAX - lnum will overflow for negative addresses). So verify that lnum is actually positive before doing the overflow check. Signed-off-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>
author Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>
date Thu, 16 Nov 2023 22:15:12 +0100
parents e628d7f03758
children 7c30841c60a0
comparison
equal deleted inserted replaced
33779:731efc10982a 33780:377ed6ab612c
4642 #endif 4642 #endif
4643 if (i == '-') 4643 if (i == '-')
4644 lnum -= n; 4644 lnum -= n;
4645 else 4645 else
4646 { 4646 {
4647 if (n >= LONG_MAX - lnum) 4647 if (lnum >= 0 && n >= LONG_MAX - lnum)
4648 { 4648 {
4649 emsg(_(e_line_number_out_of_range)); 4649 emsg(_(e_line_number_out_of_range));
4650 goto error; 4650 goto error;
4651 } 4651 }
4652 lnum += n; 4652 lnum += n;